Notice how effortlessly the LA Times and George Gascon equate victims of crime with their criminal abusers. We need to “compassionately” integrate criminals back into the communities that they have a history of terrorizing and victimizing.🙄 You get what you vote for🤡 https://t.co/6Reon2CbJ7
— JOHN MCKINNEY #PROPORTIONAL JUSTICE (@johnmckinney_) September 12, 2022
NEW: The campaign to recall LA DA @GeorgeGascon issues a statement in response to failure to qualify the recall on the ballot. They will review the nearly 200k rejected signatures.
— Bill Melugin (@BillFOXLA) August 15, 2022
“The removal of George Gascon from office has never been a matter of if, but when.” @FoxNews pic.twitter.com/rs7kLIAHj2
NEW: A new poll from @BerkeleyIGS shows the effort to recall L.A. DA @GeorgeGascon would have started with a 20 point lead & had a good chance of success if it had made it to the ballot. Countywide, voters largely disapprove of Gascon by margin of 46%-21%.https://t.co/4kUNHljhVL
— Bill Melugin (@BillFOXLA) August 26, 2022
Los Angeles County is the largest jail system in the country, and its home to the largest jurisdiction in the state. These changes out of the DA’s office are the change we’ve been waiting for, and I hope they have a ripple effect across the country.
— Kim Kardashian (@KimKardashian) December 7, 2020
More people will see the justice they deserve soon. @GeorgeGascon
— Kim Kardashian (@KimKardashian) December 7, 2020
“Despite the significant efforts by community justice partners, a comprehensive pre-trial services program has not been fully realized,” the memo states. “After listening to the community, victims, and members of this office, I have decided to allow limited exceptions to the pre-trial release policy while such a program is finalized.”…Eric Siddall, vice president of the Association of Deputy District Attorneys, described Gascon’s zero-bail policy as an “unmitigated failure of leadership.”“It took 18 months of smash-and-grab robberies and revolving-door reoffenders for George Gascón to admit what it took Angelenos about 18 minutes to know in their guts — his bail policy didn’t work and it made all of us unsafe,” he said in an email Friday. “His stubborn refusal to course-correct was a failure of competency.
CA voters approved decriminalization of crimes, bail reform as it was sold to “benefit” safe neighborhoods by Kamala Harris and Gascon they co-authored Prop 47
— Diana Flores (@helpingeducate) June 28, 2022
As that city's lead prosecutor, Gascon authored a ballot measure to reduce some felonies to misdemeanors, including some thefts, which led San Francisco to have the nation's highest property crime rate per capita in the U.S., according to the Associated Press.
What nerve to call this proposition "THE SAFE NEIGHBORHOODS and SCHOOLS ACT". My gosh. That's one major mindf**k. This law is the complete opposite. They are counting on you simply reading the title and not bother reading the new law. (emphasis mind)
- Shoplifting. The proposition added Penal Code section 459.5 to create a new misdemeanor offense called "shoplifting," punishable by up to 6 months in county jail. Shoplifting would be defined as "entering a commercial establishment with intent to commit larceny while that establishment is open during regular business hours" where the value of the property does not exceed $950. Any other entry into a commercial establishment with intent to commit larceny is burglary. Any act of shoplifting as defined above must be charged as shoplifting. No person charged with shoplifting may also be charged with burglary or theft of the same property.
- Forgery. Before Proposition 47, forgery under Penal Code section 473 was a wobbler offense. Proposition 47 reclassified forgery of specified instruments involving $950 or less as exclusively a misdemeanor. The misdemeanor provision is not applicable to any person convicted both of forgery and identity theft under Penal Code section 530.5.
- Insufficient Funds. Before Proposition 47, a violation of Penal Code section 476a was a wobbler offense, except that the offense was strictly a misdemeanor if the total underlying amount did not exceed $450, unless the person was previously convicted of one of several specified theft offenses. Proposition 47 increased the total threshold amount for misdemeanors from $450 to $950 and increased the number of disqualifying prior convictions from one to "three or more."
- Petty Theft. Proposition 47 added Penal Code section 490.2 to expressly define petty theft as “obtaining any property by theft where the value of the money, labor, real or personal property taken” does not exceed $950. This new definition of petty theft applies notwithstanding Section 487 “or any other provision of law defining grand theft.” (Pen. Code, § 490.2(a).) As such, the new definition of petty theft appears to apply regardless of how specific categories of property are treated under separate statutes. This new provision is not applicable to any theft that may be charged as an infraction “pursuant to any other provision of law.”
- Receiving Stolen Property. Before Proposition 47, a violation of Penal Code section 496 was a wobbler offense, except that if the value of the property did not exceed $950, the district attorney or grand jury could specify the offense as exclusively a misdemeanor “in the interests of justice.” Proposition 4 7 rendered all violations of section 496 that do not exceed $950 as strictly misdemeanors, eliminating prosecutorial discretion to charge those offenses as felonies.
- Petty Theft with a Prior. For most defendants, Proposition 47 eliminated the offense of petty theft with a prior under Penal Code section 666 by narrowing the category of persons subject to punishment under that section to only include persons required to register under the Sex Offender Registration Act, persons with prior violent or serious felony convictions under section 667.5(e)(2)(C)(iv), and persons convicted of Penal Code section 368(d) or (e) [specified theft crimes involving elder or dependent adults].
LA DA George Gascon recently spoke about the need for sensible gun laws. CA has some of the toughest gun laws, if they are enforced. His office gave a felon/gang member w/ a prior strike a plea deal for probation on his gun charge instead of prison.
— Bill Melugin (@BillFOXLA) June 16, 2022
He killed 2 cops on Tuesday. https://t.co/fEW5QhpRAS pic.twitter.com/VNaTRCEyFQ
THREAD: Carlos Delcid, the man charged w/ murdering a Monterey Park police officer this month, had two strikes on his record that weren’t prosecuted by @LADAOffice during his felony DV case in Feb. The strikes would have brought mandatory prison time. They were apparently missed. pic.twitter.com/snTQlaLCdN
— Bill Melugin (@BillFOXLA) August 26, 2022
NEW: 37 cities in Los Angeles County have now issued votes of no confidence in L.A. DA @GeorgeGascon. The cities of Glendora & South El Monte are the latest to issue such a vote tonight, as Gascon continues to paint recall effort as a GOP power grab. Recall deadline approaching. https://t.co/LXNX6z7lid
— Bill Melugin (@BillFOXLA) June 29, 2022
NEW: Sources in LA DA office tell me victim advocates in the “lifer” unit were told Tuesday they will soon no longer be allowed to notify crime victims/next of kin about an inmate’s upcoming parole hearings, because Gascon admin finds it “not appropriate ”. Unit to be disbanded. pic.twitter.com/xad9pIia4r
— Bill Melugin (@BillFOXLA) July 14, 2022
But but but... gun control. 🙄 For who? Us not the criminals he supports terrorizing us. (emphasis mine)Gascon refuses to prosecute gun & gang enhancements, he dismantled the hardcore gangs unit of veteran prosecutors who handle the most serious gang crimes, and he refuses to prosecute juvenile gang shooters as adults, even days from 18. Out by age 25 and DJJ being is phased out. https://t.co/Asmp9mwUFp
— Bill Melugin (@BillFOXLA) April 22, 2022
No comments:
Post a Comment