October 16, 2021

WORLD: 2010 New World Order Lockstep Plan Outlines A "PRECISE SCENARIO" For A Global Pandemic. Globalist Sponsored "Factcheckers" Say This is FALSE. Here, You Decide For Yourself.

I typed a transcript below of the video in tweet above.

In 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation, one of the most influential NGO's in the world, developed scenarios for the future of technology and international development. This report. (He holds it up.) In this report the Rockefeller Foundation describes the Lock Step scenario. This describes an impending global pandemic and its aftermath. According to this scenario, and I have it here with me, the Chinese would start with 'mandatory quarantines for all citizens and an immediate and almost hermitically sealed closure of all borders.' National leaders from across the world would reinforce their power with laws, regulations, and restrictions. From mask mandates to body temperature checks at the entrances of train stations, airplanes, buildings. It's all in here. But it does not stop at that. According to the Lock Step Scenario there is a great deal more that awaits us. 'Even after the pandemic was over.' write the researchers, 'the authoritarian control and surveillance of citizens and their activities remained and was even intensified.' In this report from 2010 they even hinted at 'climate lockdowns' exactly what they're beginning to talk about right now. And now I quote, 'To protect themselves from problems that became ever more global from pandemics and transnational terrorism to climate crisis and increasing poverty, leaders across the world seized more and more power.' The report also foresaw how people would react to these measures, regrettably. Just like now, when people cheer when they are vaccinated, post pictures of their jabs on social media... it's all in this report... and beg for a COVID passport... anticipated the writers of Lock Step Scenario.

I typed a transcript below of the video in tweet above.

The idea of a more controlled world would gain widespread acceptance among the populace. 'Citizens willingly gave up a part of their sovereignty and their privacy in exchange for more safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant and even eager to be subjected to more top-down management and supervision. National leaders had more freedom to bestow order in the ways that they saw fit. That this would lead to a digital passport was something they had foreseen. In 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation could not entirely anticipate the current technological advances but even then they already thought that the tightened surveillance would lead to a 'biometric ID for all citizens'. Currently, this is already being integrated into our passports. It would take 13 years for the public, according to the Rockefeller Foundation, to be fed up with the amount of control and the absurd powerfantasies of the rulers. I hope that the Rockefeller Foundation is proven wrong on that account. All their predictions have come true. But I really hope they're wrong on this account. I hope that there will be a moment that we wake up. That we will realize this is a collective psychosis. That the locking down of the entire country, half the world for 1.5 years because of a flu variety is insane. That walking around with those silly useless masks is insanity. That we conform ourselves to those completely senseless distancing rules. That we see that our businesses, our social lives have been destroyed. That we have held back effective primary medicines such as Ivermictin, only to give those experimental injections the status of 'approved vaccines' as soon as we could. That we now ramble about how 'the infections are decreasing' while the exact same happened last year like it does every year and will happen again as autumn arrives and new infections occur.

I typed a transcript below of the video in tweet above.

And now we pretend it happens because of covid19 all the while that the thing we use to call 'the flu' has completely disappeared. But most importantly, I hope that we realize that with the hysteria about this Chinese flu as the pretext, an entire infrastructure has been built. An infrastructure that can be used again at any moment due to any occurrence. Lockdowns, masks, social distancing, no more traveling, no hand shakes, ridiculous experimental jabs. This covid phase has been a practice TO TRAIN OBEDIENCE. Our parliament and the Rutte regime have passed this training with grace. Congratulations. Klaus Schwab will be proud of you. The globalist plans can be carried out and the next step towards mass surveillance and total control can be taken.

I took these screenshot from this Rockefeller Foundation PDF document CLICK HERE to read the entire report. I did an internet search on Google to get more information and the 1984 Ministry of Truth "Fact Checkers" was front and center telling people this was FALSE information or "misinformation" and a "conspiracy theory". I took screenshots below. I had to use freedom based duckduckgo search engine to get UNCENSORED information about this and much more.
The Freedom Articles
written by Makia Freeman
March 2020

A Rockefeller Foundation paper,

would it surprise you to know, predicted and planned for the exact type of pandemic scenario in which we find ourselves right now with the COVID-19 coronavirus. Unlike Bill Gates’ Event 201 which was 2 months before the official outbreak, this Rockefeller Foundation paper was published 10 years ago in 2010. Entitled Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development, the paper outlines a scenario where a pandemic has hit, and the governments of the world use it to expand their authority and increase their grip on power. Although the authors of the paper try to claim they are just imagining not predicting the future, given the immense role of the Rockefeller family bloodline and Rockefeller Foundation in pushing the New World Order (NWO) Global Government, this is a ruse to cover their active planning for crisis scenarios that they know will happen. It is also a fine example of predictive programming.

Predictive Programming: Lock Step

One of the scenarios of the paper is called “Lock Step”, a phrase with negative overtones and suggestive of soldiers, the military and, for some, fascism. Just as Bill Gates was adamant that his Event 201 was just a “simulation” and not a “prediction”, so too does this Rockefeller Foundation paper claim that its scenarios are not predictions:
“Importantly, scenarios are not predictions. Rather, they are thoughtful hypotheses that allow us to imagine, and then to rehearse, different strategies for how to be more prepared for the future—or more ambitiously, how to help shape better futures ourselves … scenarios are a medium through which great change can be not just envisioned but also actualized.“
However, their intention is clear: to use the opportunity of the scenario or crisis to shape a “better future” or transform the world into their likeness – a New World Order global totalitarian dictatorship. The Lock Step scenario is described as “a world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback” and is based on a pandemic of a virus (an influenza strain) which infects nearly 20% of the world population and kills 8 million people in 7 months. The following points are quotes taken directly from the paper, with my comment in parentheses at the end of each. Look at what happened in this ‘fictional’ scenario:
– The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers. (Happening now)

– The United States’s initial policy of “strongly discouraging” citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders. (Happening now – note the obvious criticism of the USG as too lenient for not controlling its citizens more)

– However, a few countries did fare better—China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery. (Already happened – note the obvious praise for Chinese authoritarianism)

– During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. (Already happened – note the prediction and foreshadowing of body-temperature checks)

– In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example … (About to be activated with mandatory vaccination – see Bill Gates ID2020)
The Lock Step scenario then discusses what technological trends and applications we might see. Here are its predictions:
– Scanners using advanced functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) technology become the norm at airports and other public areas to detect abnormal behavior that may indicate “antisocial intent.” (Happening now)

– In the aftermath of pandemic scares, smarter packaging for food and beverages is applied first by big companies and producers in a business-to-business environment, and then adopted for individual products and consumers. (Not yet happened)

– New diagnostics are developed to detect communicable diseases. The application of health screening also changes; screening becomes a prerequisite for release from a hospital or prison, successfully slowing the spread of many diseases. (Not yet happened)

– Tele-presence technologies respond to the demand for less expensive, lower-bandwidth, sophisticated communications systems for populations whose travel is restricted. (Happening now)

– Driven by protectionism and national security concerns, nations create their own independent, regionally defined IT networks, mimicking China’s firewalls. Governments have varying degrees of success in policing internet traffic, but these efforts nevertheless fracture the “World Wide” Web. (Already happened – before the COVID-19 crisis, North Korea, Iran, Cuba and Russia developed their own national intranets).
As Rockefeller Foundation Paper shows, Nothing in the Political World Happens by Chance

To paraphrase Franklin Roosevelt, if something happens in the world of politics or geopolitics, you can bet it was planned that way. This Rockefeller Foundation paper reminds me of other key conspiracy accounts and documents which have also somehow magically (on the surface) “predicted” the future. In actuality, they are blueprints written by key insiders who already know the game plan and the agenda, and have the power to make it happen.
The Uncreated Light published February 2020: Coronavirus - Event 201, Bill Gates. In October 2019, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security hosted a pandemic tabletop exercise called Event 201 with partners, the World Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. In this they modeled a coronavirus pandemic.
World Economic Forum published March 2020: We ran a massive viral pandemic simulation. Here's what we learned about managing Coronavirus.

In October 2019, participants at a pandemic response exercise called Event 201 were confronted with a hypothetical scenario to test the world’s preparedness for a viral disease outbreak.

After the emergence of the coronavirus pandemic John's Hopkins Centre for public health issued the following statement:

In October 2019, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security hosted a pandemic tabletop exercise called Event 201 with partners, the World Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Recently, the Center for Health Security has received questions about whether that pandemic exercise predicted the current novel coronavirus outbreak in China. To be clear, the Center for Health Security and partners did not make a prediction during our tabletop exercise. For the scenario, we modeled a fictional coronavirus pandemic, but we explicitly stated that it was not a prediction. Instead, the exercise served to highlight preparedness and response challenges that would likely arise in a very severe pandemic. We are not now predicting that the nCoV-2019 outbreak will kill 65 million people. Although our tabletop exercise included a mock novel coronavirus, the inputs we used for modeling the potential impact of that fictional virus are not similar to nCoV-2019.
World Economic Forum published July 14, 2020: COVID-19: The Great Reset. Since it made its entry on to the world stage, COVID-19 has torn up the existing script of how to govern countries, live with others, and take part in the global economy in a dramatic way. Professor Schwab and CEO and Founder of the Monthly Barometer Thierry Malleret explore these disruptions in their new book, COVID-19: The Great Reset.
Smithsonian Magazine
written by Rose Eveleth
Tuesday September 10, 2013

We know where they are and what they say, but everything else is all hotly debated

In Elbert County, Georgia there’s a set of stones called the Georgia Guidestones. They were put there in 1979, with a set of ten guidelines, in eight modern languages and four dead ones, carved onto the slabs. But that’s pretty much all anybody can agree on about them, as Jill Neimark writes this week at Discover Magazine. How to interpret the guidelines, who put the stone there, and what people should do about them are all hotly debated.

On the stones are ten instructions:
  1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
  2. Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.
  3. Unite humanity with a living new language.
  4. Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.
  5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
  6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
  7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
  8. Balance personal rights with social duties.
  9. Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite.
  10. Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature.
Neimark visited the stones and writes about the mystery behind them. The only man who knows who built them isn’t telling, “They could put a gun to my head and kill me, I will never reveal his real name,” he told her. And the purpose of the inscriptions isn’t even clear. Van Smith, “one of the monument’s most prominent conspiracy theorists,” says that they’re for establishing the beginnings of a totalitarian tribal government. Another theorist said that the stones were Satanic and should be destroyed. Alex Jones, a radio host and famous conspiracy theorist, says that the stones call for culling of humans.

Many hate the stones. When Randall Sullivan of Wired visited the stones in 2009, they had been vandalized, “Death to the new world order” painted on them in polyurethane paint.

Not only were the stones supposed to give messages, but their arrangement was meant to be a Stonehenge like astronomical device. Sullivan writes that the man commissioned to build them had to seek outside help to make that dream a reality:
The astrological specifications for the Guidestones were so complex that Fendley had to retain the services of an astronomer from the University of Georgia to help implement the design. The four outer stones were to be oriented based on the limits of the sun’s yearly migration. The center column needed two precisely calibrated features: a hole through which the North Star would be visible at all times, and a slot that was to align with the position of the rising sun during the solstices and equinoxes. The principal component of the capstone was a 7\8-inch aperture through which a beam of sunlight would pass at noon each day, shining on the center stone to indicate the day of the year.
But today, astronomers say the astronomical features on the guidestones are crude—”an abacus compared to Stonehenge’s computer,” Loris Magnani of the University of Georgia told Neimark.

And yet despite the confusion and mystery—or perhaps because of it—the monument has a devoted community dedicated to figuring out just what the mysterious rocks are for. And, like most conspiracy theories, the quest will probably never end.

No comments: