September 1, 2023

CANADA: Canadian Shop Teacher Who Wore Z-Cup Breasts Exposing Large Zipples To Class Claiming They Were Real And A Long Blonde Wig TO SATISFY HIS ANIME PORN FETISH, Is Now Teaching As A Man.

He stirred up so much unnecessary drama, controversy to satisfy his anime big breast porn fetish. He wasted everyone's time and energy for his own selfish reasons. He actually claimed he was intersex and those Z cup breasts were real. Turns out that was all a lie.

AND THE SCHOOL DISTRICT, SCHOOL STAFF, AND SCHOOL OFFICIALS PLAYED ALONG with his mental derangement at the expense of traumatizing the young students. Thankfully, this teacher was caught living as a man outside of school by Rebel news investigative reporters in Canada. It's unbelievable that this Canadian school district is still allowing him to be around underage children? HE LIED ABOUT EVERYTHING and you defended him and still do. What is wrong with you school officials?! You're supposed to be protecting the children placed in your care from this kind of deranged person. Is it because you are deranged too? Do parents need to be concerned about you too? (emphasis mine)
Rebel News published May 30, 2023 Busty Lemieux BUSTED again! And you'll never believe what happened next. Rebel News reporter David Menzies was violently shoved into a door after attempting to ask transgender shop teacher Kayla "Busty" Lemieux questions at a teachers' meeting in Ontario.

The New York Post
written by Jack Morphet, Melissa Klein, and Bruce Golding
Sunday February 19, 2023

The Canadian high school teacher who goes to work wearing size Z prosthetic breasts incredibly claimed they’re not fake — and denied being the person photographed leaving home without them — but acknowledged she can’t prove it.

“I’m not wearing prosthetic breasts. These are real,” Kayla Lemieux told The Post during an exclusive interview Saturday.

Lemieux — who wore women’s clothing, with a blond wig, makeup and her enormous breasts — said she’s “not a transgendered person” but was born “intersex.”

“My condition is classified as gigantomastia, which can also be referred to as macromastia or breast hypertrophy,” Lemieux said during a sit-down at a cafe in Burlington, near Toronto.

“It’s rare, there’s no doubt about it. It affects women on a very rare basis, but in my case, I believe — and my doctor thinks — because I have XX chromosomes as well, that has something to do with it, and hormone sensitivity to estrogen has caused it.”

When pressed for proof, Lemieux — who spoke in a soft, high-pitched voice with a pronounced Canadian accent — said she’d never received a formal diagnosis.

Lemieux also denied being the person who was photographed by The Post last week driving out of her apartment building and walking on a sidewalk a short time later.

That person — who was dressed in men’s clothing and did not have breasts — bore a striking resemblance to the teacher and was identified by a neighbor as Lemieux.

“I can’t tell you who that is because I don’t want to bring anyone else into this. I don’t want that person being thrown all over the media, but it wasn’t me,” Lemieux said.

“This is who I am. This is how I look. You’ve been talking to people in my building but what they’re telling you is harsh and untrue. I am always going out looking the way I am.”

Asked if her appearance ever differed from the way she looked at the time, Lemieux said, “I guess if I took my wig off or took my makeup off.”

“But I would still have breasts. You can’t hide them. People online making comments are basically body-shaming,” Lemieux added.

Lemieux has sparked worldwide controversy since photos and videos of her went viral last year, shortly after she began working as a shop teacher at Ontario’s Oakville Trafalgar High School in September.

The school has also been subjected to repeated bomb and gun threats, with targeted threats made against Lemieux and school officials.

Students have also reportedly been threatened with suspension if they snap photos or shoot video of Lemieux on school grounds.

Lemieux told The Post that she began undergoing hormone replacement therapy in 2021 and was “in transition.”

“I identify as a woman. Female. She/her,” Lemieux said.

When asked if the hormone therapy was responsible for the size of her breasts, she said, “Yes.”

“My whole life, I’ve been identifying as male. I’ve been looking like a male. When I decided to embrace this other side of me around age 39, this presented itself,” she said.

Lemieux said that being intersex “can mean different things to different people but generally, as a male you’re born with XY chromosomes and women with XX chromosomes.”

“Intersex people can have a mixture of those two different sets of chromosomes. It can be something they don’t even know about. It can show up in other physical attributes at birth so it can be more obvious or less obvious, depending on the person,” Lemieux said.

The famed Cleveland Clinic describes gigantomastia, which Lemieux claims she has, as “a rare condition that involves developing extremely large breasts due to excessive breast tissue growth,” with only about 300 cases reported.

“It affects people assigned female at birth. If you have gigantomastia, you’ll experience rapid and disproportionate breast growth. The speed at which your breasts grow can vary, from over a few weeks to over several years,” according to the Cleveland Clinic’s website.

“It can happen during puberty, pregnancy or from taking medication. In some cases, it occurs spontaneously and for no reason.”

Photos and video of Lemieux shot in school have shown her wearing tight clothing with large nipples protruding under the fabric of her top.

Outraged parents demanded that the Halton District School Board impose a dress code for teachers, which was initially rejected last year due to concerns about violating Ontario’s Human Rights Code.

In January, the school board agreed to develop a policy requiring that teachers maintain an “appropriate and professional” appearance, but a Wednesday school board meeting erupted in raucous public complaints, according to the National Post.

Cops were called after several board members left the room and one woman reportedly was ejected.

Julia Malott, a transgender mom from Kitchener, Ontario, attended the meeting and spoke in favor of a dress code that would allow teachers to express their self-identified genders.

But Malott, 32, told The Post that she was baffled by Lemieux’s prosthetic breasts.

“I cannot fathom why someone would wear something that publicly sexualizes themselves in such a way,” Malott said. “What they are wearing is absolutely not appropriate for school. It is fetish wear used in sex work and the drag industry or people in their own houses who enjoy it. It is certainly not something I would want my daughter to see.”

Malott also said, “When you transition, your goal is to blend in, to the extent that’s possible.”

“When someone wears such large prosthetic breasts, which captures international attention, that’s what’s left in many people’s minds about trans people in general,” she said. “It doesn’t cast a good light.”

Lemieux told The Post that she “would follow the direction of the board on what they mandated” but denied that she dressed in a provocative fashion.

“I don’t think there’s any problems with how I have dressed. It’s the personal opinion of other people. I don’t think I have dressed unprofessionally,” she said.

“I am covered up in all these photographs that have been taken. There were some comments in the fall about me wearing what they called bicycle shorts and they said that was inappropriate.

“But if you look at those pictures, they come nearly to my knees. You could call them short leggings in a way. There are teachers wearing leggings to school all the time,” she added.

When asked about her prominent nipples, Lemieux declined to answer.

Lemieux also said she was “fit to be a school teacher” and said she’s “never discussed my personal life in the classroom.”

“The narrative is, I look sexualized. That is a narrative that has been constructed,” she said. “People are not really in my opinion sexualized. People look the way they look, they can’t help it. You should embrace the way you are, you should be confident in the person you are.”

Lemieux added: “If I had a low opinion of myself or if I didn’t have such a wonderful self-image, I would have been crushed by everything that’s gone on in the media.

“But to me, it’s just background noise. It’s very annoying and is a bit scary, actually,” she added.

When asked why she agreed to break her silence and speak publicly, Lemieux acknowledged that it took “some courage.”

“I am trying to show I am a person, I have feelings and I am trying to show people I am human,” she said. “I am not trying to win anybody over or get anyone on my side. People will believe whatever they want to believe. It’s time to get my story out there.”

Representatives of Oakville Trafalgar High School, the Halton District School Board and the Ontario Education Ministry didn’t immediately return requests for comment.
Feminist Current
written by Meghan Murphy
September 21, 2022

Where did you all think this was going? The “transwomen are women” mantra, the “inclusivity” at any cost approach, the laws that demand we allow any male full access to women’s spaces and that we call him ma’am at that? Here. Here is where it was going.

In the past week, news that a teacher named Kayla Lemieux has been teaching his shop classes at Oakville Trafalgar High School in women’s clothing, a blonde wig, and cartoonishly large, prosthetic breasts went viral.

Most normal people were shocked that a professional would parade his pornographic fetish in front of students, never mind be supported by the Oakville school and district school board. Surely, the students had not been the only ones to notice the Manufacturing Technology instructor arriving to work looking this way, yet the school failed to address it.

This is apparently because, as of last year, Lemieux began identifying as a woman. Reduxx reports that one student tweeted, “Last year, the teacher was a man. I don’t think the school can fire him.”

There are many women who began raising the alarm about transgenderism over the past decade (some, for even longer), particularly about its connection to pornography and fetishism.

Transgenderism, for most men, is not about the invented concept of “gender identity.” There is no such thing as having a “feminine” interior and a male exterior. One cannot be born with or acquire a “feminine” soul. In truth, what most men who now publicly identify as “transwomen” (or simply as “women”) have is a fetish and/or some form of mental illness.

While even many of those critical of the trans trend continue to treat transgenderism as a legitimate concept (that is to say, they believe and speak as though “trans” is a legitimate identity — as though some people in this world truly are the opposite sex “on the inside”), the reality is that, for most men, this is a sexual fetish. These adult “transwomen” are men who are turned on at the thought of themselves as “women,” as well as by moving about in public dressed as such. Part of this fetish is indeed about exhibitionism — being seen dressed “as women” in public.

This was once a practice widely frowned upon, but thanks to progressive politicians, institutions, activists, and members of the public, it has become not only accepted but celebrated. Indeed, progressives have given these men exactly what they wanted: narcissistic supply.

These men have been allowed not only access to female spaces such as change rooms, transition houses, shelters, and prisons, but they have been allowed to take over and dominate conversations about women’s rights and spaces. Even those men who claim to be critical of gender identity ideology prop themselves up as experts — the only ones brave enough to speak out — above and beyond the women who have been fighting this issue from the get go.

Needless to say, what we are facing today could have easily been predicted. This was never about “accepting” those who are different or supporting lesbian and gay rights, now glued to the “T.” This was about allowing men access and dominance. This was about entitled, male bullies forcing the world to bend to their will. And bend we did.

In what universe could we imagine a male teacher doing his job in massive prosthetic breasts, emulating anime porn, with “nipples” protruding, a ridiculous blonde wig, and bike shorts without being laughed (or shamed) out of the classroom?

This one.

It is thanks to Bill C-16 and consequent policies and practices adopted across Canada, preventing “discrimination based upon gender identity and gender expression,” that Kayla Lemieux has been entitled to parade his private sexual fetishes around in public — at work, in a classroom, at that.

When Rebel News spoke to Curtis Ennis, the Director of Education for the Halton District School Board (who specifies “He/Him” pronouns in his Twitter bio), he told the reporter that the Board is “committed to supporting all of our teachers and staff and students in an environment that upholds their dignity, their gender identity, and their gender expression.”

While there is a dress code for students, the School Board confirmed that it does not apply to staff. In response to the Rebel News reporter, who used correct pronouns to refer to Lemieux, Ennis said, “You keep saying ‘he’… We are being respectful of all our gender identities and gender expressions of all of our staff.”

It is amazing to refer to “upholding dignity” in reference to a man who is embarrassing himself, the school, and his students, as though any of this is “dignified.” But what this all comes down to is institutions upholding the Ontario Human Rights Code, in keeping with Bill C-16, which amended the Canadian Human Rights Act and Criminal Code to add gender identity and gender expression to the list of prohibited grounds of discrimination. As a result, Lemieux could claim “discrimination” were he to be fired for displaying his “gender identity” at work.

This is why the least dignified scenario imaginable is being defended under the guise of upholding “dignity” and human rights.

In keeping with the gender identity cult, even Canadian media outlets are insisting on defending Lemieux as a “woman,” mocking the outcry as “anti-trans” and those objecting of faking concern for the students.

Lauren O’Neil at BlogTO dared claim this was an issue of women’s rights, writing:
“This is far from the first time that a woman educator has been criticized widely online for wearing something deemed ‘inappropriate’ or ‘distracting’ to work, nor is it the first time that a teacher from the LGBTQIA2S+ community been harassed for expressing their identity.

Just a few weeks ago, an elementary school teacher from New Jersey went viral for having a ‘curvy’ figure, inadvertently soliciting thousands of unwanted sexual advances and insults.”
Phoebe Maltz Bovy at the Globe and Mail also compared the issue to female students being sexualized by adults at school, offering the example of “a young girl, a teen or tween” who “gets in trouble with her school’s administration for a dress-code violation,” accused of “looking provocative.” Girls can’t help their bodies, and feminists have fought men’s objectification of those girls for decades. Maltz Bovy acknowledges this, and says that despite the fact “people do not choose their gender identities,” this goes to far. Clearly the teacher’s “breasts” can be helped, and they veer overtly into pornographic territory. “It’s a choice to wear what is effectively a fetish outfit while teaching, in a way that is visible to all,” Maltz Bovy explains.

She’s right, but the problem lies in having defended “gender identity” as a legal concept in the first place, and in insisting that “inclusivity” means accepting and celebrating any and every “identity” and “sexuality” claimed as part of the LGBTQ++ umbrella. It is not necessary to “accept” drag queens in the classroom, nor must we protect the “rights” of men who claim to be women in the public sphere. “Transgenderism” as a legitimate legal concept is the problem — once we say that men who claim to be women are indeed so and cannot be challenged with the truth, all is lost. We cannot protect kids or women if we go along with this charade.

The result is that men with fetishes now dictate who may tweet (and about what), when and where women may have safety and privacy (nowhere), who must be fired should they challenge the men’s identities, on what grounds women must compete in sport (unfair ones!), and what girls must accept at school.

The fact that we are having this conversation at all (and that Lemieux is being protected) is the result of Bill C-16, and due to progressives across the country having supported the notion that one could “identify” as the opposite sex, and must be protected, legally, on those grounds.

Kayla Lemieux is not a “she.” Stop with this nonsense. He is a ridiculous, entitled, inappropriate man with a fetish and anyone who cannot say so is a coward. Calling him “she” is not respectful, it is an insult to all females.

This is the result of society going along with a silly lie everyone knows is just that.

Lemieux may have no shame, but the rest of us should.

No comments: