April 23, 2023

Do We Live in a Brave New World? Is 1984 Becoming a Reality? We Were Warned Huxley And Orwell. The Fabian Society, Eugenics, and the Historic Forces Behind Today’s Systemic Breakdown

Look at the Fabian Society logo. The picture is a wolf in sheep's clothing. Okaaay I had no idea Aldous Huxley was an inner circle member of The Fabian Society. He wrote the Brave New World. Huxley taught at Eaton College. His brother promoted eugenics. Eric Blair was Huxley's student who later changed his name to George Orwell 😱(emphasis mine)
GlobalAwareness101 published April 23, 2023: I want to point out that Klaus Schwab head of the World Economic Forum who promoted, "you will own nothing and be happy." also has a love for Stalin. So much so Klaus displays a bust of Stalin on the shelf of his office shown in his videos. And I was not surprised to find out recently about his father. George Soros worked for the Nazis as a child.

From GB Shaw on YouTube: In this clip from the 2008 film "The Soviet Story", we see that George Bernard Shaw, the celebrated progressive playwright defended Hitler, advocated killing those who can't justify their existence and called for the development of lethal gas 10 years before the national socialists in Germany did exactly that.

George Bernard Shaw was one of the left's most revered figures and the only person to win both an Oscar and a Nobel prize.

In this clip Snore documents three points that many viewers find disturbing:

1. Shaw was a vocal supporter of Hitler, Stalin and Mussolini
2. Shaw supported mass killing of the unproductive
3. Shaw advocated creating a Zyklon-B type gas to allow more "humane" mass killing

The historical record for these claims is clear, but many posters dispute the second point by stating (without support) that Shaw was being sarcastic or even joking. Unfortunately, this is clearly not the case as is obvious from reading Shaw's writings and public comments in the broad context of the time they were written.

When Shaw's controversial statements on eugenics were reported in the media, he did not dispute them or claim that the quotes were taken out of context.

Johnny Vedmore published September 19, 2022: Klaus Schwab’s Father and His Nazi Model Company with Johnny Vedmore The Greatest Reset Documentary. Here Johnny Vedmore talks about Klaus Schwab’s father, Eugen Schwab, who was the Managing Director of the Ravensberg Escher Wyss factory during WWII. Schwab’s Model Nazi Company manufactured flamethrowers, submarine parts & equipment for enriching uranium to aid the Nazi atomic bomb program. You can watch the Greatest Reset for free at GreatestReset.Movie
Academy of Ideas published June 28, 2021: Do We Live in a Brave New World? - Aldous Huxley's Warning to the World.
Academy of Ideas published August 7, 2021: Is 1984 Becoming a Reality? - George Orwell's Warning to the World.
1984 was published in 1949. I typed a transcript for you below:

In 1940 George Orwell wrote:
Almost certainly we are moving into an age of totalitarian dictatorships - an age in which freedom will be at first a deadly sin and later on a meaningless abstraction. The autonomous individual is going to be stamped out of existence.
George Orwell's dystopian novel 1984 is a work of fiction. But much that is depicted in it reflects the political reality of many nations past and present.

"At least three-quarters of what Orwell narrates is not negative Utopia, but history." Umberto Eco wrote.

Referring to his time spent in Belgrade under Communist rule. Lawrence Durrell wrote that, "Reading [1984] in a Communist country is really an experience because one can see it all around one."

In this vide we are going to explore some of the similarities between the totalitarian systems in the 20th century and Orwell's 1984. And as will become evident, many of these totalitarian traits are reemerging in the modern world. This investigation will be conducted in the recognition that totalitarianism relies on mass support. And so contemporary societies desperately need more to withdraw their support of this brutal form of rule.

Shortly after 1984 was published, Orwell explained:
The moral to be drawn from this dangerous nightmare situation is a simple one. Don't let it happen. It depends on you.
Totalitarianism is a political system whereby a centralized state apparatus attempts to control virtually all aspects of life.

"Everything within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state." The Italian dictator Mussolini put it.

While totalitarianism can emerge under the guise of various political ideologies. In the 20th century it was called communism and fascism that provided the ideological support for this type of rule.

Communism and fascism are often viewed as being on opposite ends of the political spectrum. But in the manner they were put into practice in the 20th century, both of these systems displayed the characteristics of the totalized all controlling state. Both used force and propaganda to retain power, crush economic and civil liberties, smother culture, partake in mass surveillance and terrorize the citizenry with psychological warfare and eventually mass imprisonment and mass murder.

Speaking of Stalin's communist Russia and Hitler's Nazi Germany, Orwell explained:
"The two regimes, having started from opposite ends, are rapidly evolving towards the same system - a form of oligarchical collectivism."
In the communist and fascist political systems of the 20th century and in 1984, the totalitarian regime maintained a tight grip of control of the populace through the use of manufactured fear.

"Totalitarian leaders, whether of the right or of the left, know better than anyone else how to make use of...fear... They thrive on chaos and bewilderment... The strategy of fear is one of their most valuable tactics." wrote Joost Meerloo, Rape of the Mind.

In 1984, continuous war between the three super states perpetuated the state of fear. It was not important who was at war with who or who was allied with who as this was changing all the time. And the point of the war was not for one state to conquer another, but for all three super states to work behind the scenes to create the conditions of terror that would enable them all to institute totalitarian controls within their own borders.

Constant surveillance of all the citizens was an additional tool in the arsenal of the totalitarian regime of 1984. Surveillance not only allowed more effective overt control of the citizenry, but it also induced paranoia which made it less likely that any citizen would even dare step out of line. This surveillance was achieved firstly through the technology of the telescreen which was installed in everyone's home and throughout the streets. And as Orwell explained:
"The telescreen received and transmitted simultaneously. There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment. It was even conceivable that they watched everybody all the time. But at any rate they could plug in your wire whenever they wanted to. You had to live - did live, from habit that became instinct - in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every movement scrutinized."
Secondly mass surveillance of the citizenry was conducted by the citizens of 1984 themselves. Each person watched everyone else. And each person was in turn watched by everyone else.

The most innocent expressions, an innocusous statement, or subtle look of disapproval when Big Brother appeared on the telescreen was reported to the thought police and treated as a thought crime or face crime as evidence that one was disloyal and had something to hide.
"It is intolerable to us that an erroneous thought should exist anywhere in the world, however secret and powerless it may be." Orwell has the character O'Brien explain.
In Stalinist Russia, Alekandr Solzhenitsyn noted that one could never be sure that one's neighbor, friends, coworkers, the postman, or even in some cases one's own family would report to the secret police a slip of the tongue, a critisim of Stalin, or communism.

For if one was reported their fate was usually sealed. The police would knock at the door in the middle of the night and soon after one would be given the standard sentence of a tenure. That is 10 YEARS OF SLAVE LABOR in the gulag prison camps. This form of surveillance created social conditions wherein most citizens adopted hypocrisy and lying as a way of life.

Solzhenitsyn explains in The Gulag Archepelago, "The permanent lie becomes the only safe form of existence. Every wag of the tongue can be overheard by someone, every facial expression observed by someone. Therefore every word, if it does not have to be a direct lie, is nonetheless obliged not to contradict the general, common lie. There exists a collection of ready-made phrases, of labels, a selection of ready-made lies."

In addition to a ubiquitous state of fear in totalitarianism there exists a wide state of confusion and mental disorientation amongst the citizenry.

"Many victims of totalitarianism have told me in interviews that the most upsetting experience they faced... was the feeling of loss of logic, the state of confusion into which they had been brought - the state in which nothing had any validity... they simply did not know what was what." wrote Joost Meerloo, Rape of the Mind.

In 1984, widespread mental disorientation was stimulated via the falsification of history and the negation of the concept of objective truth. The Ministry of Truth was the institution that falsified history.
"Everything faded into mist. The past was erased, the erasure was forgotton, the lie became truth." Orwell wrote.
One of the reasons totalitarian regimes attempt to alter history is because it rids the society of any past reference points or standards of comparison. Which might remind the citizens that life in the past was so much better than it is in the sterile and depressant present.
"Within twenty years at the most, the huge and simple question, 'Was life better before the Revolution than it is now?' would have ceased once and for all to be answerable." wrote Orwell 1984.
But another reason history is falsified by totalitarians is to insure there are no historical roots to which the citizen can anchor and find truth, sustenance, and strength. In totalitarianism there can be no historical information that contradicts or puts into question the reigning ideology, nor any institution such as religion which offers the individual a refuge from the influence of the state.
And so as Orwell wrote in 1984, "Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book has been re-written, every picture has been re-painted, every statue and street and building has been re-named, every date has been altered. And that process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right."
Along with destroying or falsifying the past, widespread mental disorientation is further cultivated by destroying the belief in objective truth. This is done through a program of psychological warfare. Incessant and confusing propaganda, conflicting reports and blatant lies are pumped out in official reports and through the mass media at all hours of the day. What is said today has no bearing on what may be said tomorrow.
For as Orwell explained, "the totalitarian state... sets up questionable dogmas, and it alters them day by day. It needs the dogmas, because it needs absolute obedience from its subjects, but it cannot avoid the changes, which are dictated by the needs of power politics."
In 1984 for example, the ministry of plenty put out a bulletin that they were increasing the chocolate ration to 20 grammes a week.
Orwell writes, "And only yesterday, [Winston] reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to 20 grammes a week. Was it possible that [the citizens] could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it. Was he, then, alone in the possession of a memory?"
In addition, contraditions, hypocrisies, and lies form the foundation of the totalitarian ideology. The totalitarian system presents the enslavement of the individual as his or her liberation. Censoring information is called protecting the truth. The destruction of culture or the economy is called its development. The military occupation of other countries is labeled as the furtherance of freedom and peace.

In 1984 the Ministry of Peace instigated wars. The Ministry of Truth manufactured propaganda. And The Ministry of Plenty created shortages.

On the enormous pyramidal structure of Ministry of Truth hung the words, "War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength."
"The official ideology abounds with contradictions even where there is no practical reason for them... These contradictions are not accidental." Orwell explained in 1984.
The purpose of this all encompassing program of psychological warfare is to bewilder the mind of the average citizen. For when the citizen is bombarded with contradictions and lies and lives in what Orwell called:
"that shifting phantasmagoric world in which black may be white tomorrow and yesterday's weather can be changed bhy decree."
He or she eventually ceases to know what to think or even how to think. The distinction between up and down, fact and fiction, truth and faslsity is not only blurred but loses significance. The belief in objective truth disappears. And the average citizen becomes completely dependent on authority figures to feed him ideas and thus is ready ascent to lies and believe the most obsurd things so long as those in the political class deem it to be true.

The Soviet official Georgy Pyatakov explained that the true Bolshevik, "would be ready to believe that black was white, and white was black, if the Party required it... there was no particle left inside him which was not at one with the Party, did not belong to it."

In an essay titled, Totalitarianism and the Lie, Leszek Kolakowski a philosopher who was exiled from Poland for his criticisms of communism and Marxism wrote, "This is what totalitarian regimes keep unceasingly trying to achieve. People whose memory - personal or collective - has been nationalized, has become state-owned and perfectly malleable, totally controllable, are entirely at the mercy of their rulers; they have been deprived of their identity; they are helpless and incapable of questioning anything they are told to believe. They will never revolt, never think, never create; they have been transformed into dead objects."

In 1984 the main character Winston manages for most of the book to stay psychologically outside the grasp of the Party and its leader Big Brother despite the widespread fear and mental disorientation which swirls around him. DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER he writes in his diary early in the book. However, after being arrested by the thought police and subjected to reeducation, Winston abdicates his reason and conscience and begins to accept the lies. He joins the totalitarian cult and becomes another brick in the wall of the all powerful state.
Referring to Winston, Orwell writes, "He could not fight against the Party any longer. Besides, the Party was in the right. It was merely a question of learning to think as they thought. The pencil felt thick and akward in [Winston's] fingers. He began to write down the thoughts that came into his head. He wrote first in large clumsy capitals: FREEDOM IS SLAVERY. Then almost without a pause he wrote beneath it: TWO AND TWO MAKE FIVE. The struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother."
Some have taken this ending as a sign of Orwell's pessimism. As an indication that humanity is doomed to a totalitarian future. Yet, Orwell's motive for writing this book was not to depress nor to promote a fatalistic apathy. But to warn and to rouse to action as many people as possible. For Orwell understand as well as anyone that in the battle between totalitarianism and freedom, no one can afford to stand aside. The fate of each and everyone one of us hangs in the balance.
Danios12345 published June 23, 2011: Soylent Green (1973) Trailer.  starring Charlton Heston. It's described as an American ecological dystopian thriller horror film. The evil monsters of this world who are disgusted by humans wrote this movie. We are entering this nightmare scenario brought to you by Communism and 15-minute cities.

You can CLICK HERE to watch the full movie online for free. No download. Click the lower right to enlarge the screen to fullscreen. It starts with the YEAR 2022.
"Don't let it happen. It depends on you." George Orwell
GREAT PIECE that ties in with this post. 👇 (emphasis mine)

written by Matthew J.L. Ehret
March 16, 2022

The financial system is clearly careening towards a point of dissolution.

It isn’t an exaggeration to say that the collapse itself has already happened and we simply have not yet felt the full brutal force of the shockwave accelerating toward us. This process is comparable to a tectonic snap deep in the crust under the ocean. The snap happens and a tsunami has begun. It will hit the beach front with devastating consequences and only by breaking the habit of living in the myopic “moment” might those on the beach have a chance to get to safer ground before it is too late.

The question isn’t “will the system collapse”, but rather when will the full tsunami hit?

Additionally, WHAT will be the operating system that is brought online to replace the chaos of supply chain meltdowns, hyperinflation, scarcity and violence that will ensue?

Two Systems Clash

Already we can clearly see two opposing patterns that have taken form, illustrated in the remarks recently made by UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres who said:

“I fear our world is creeping towards two different sets of economic, trade, financial, and technology rules, two divergent approaches in the development of artificial intelligence—and ultimately two different military and geo-political strategies. This is a recipe for trouble. It would be far less predictable and far more dangerous than the Cold War.”

Guterres is speaking of two divergent paradigms, so what are they?

On the one hand, there is the ideology that Guterres himself devoutly supports which has taken on the title in recent years of “The Davos Agenda”, or “The Great Reset”.

Guterres even went so far as to sign UN-WEF integration treaty in June 2020 uniting both globalist bodies into one Borg-like operating system, announcing: “The Great Reset is a welcome recognition that this human tragedy must be a wake-up call. We must build more equal, inclusive and sustainable economies and societies that are more resilient in the face of pandemics, climate change and the many other global changes we face.”

While the Great Reset professes to use the current pandemic to push through a complete overhaul of human society under a technocratic world government, the opposing system driven by those nations not invited to the recent “Global Democracy summit” and labelled “authoritarians” by Soros and the Davos clique wish to avoid being sacrificed.

Where one system is premised on a scientifically managed depopulation agenda from the top, the other system asserts the right of sovereign nations to continue as the only legitimate basis for international law and scientific progress to be the basis of economic ideology. The terms of the new system were recently re-emphasized throughout the 5000 word Russia-China Joint Statement on the terms of the New Era now emerging.

Putin himself recently laid out these terms stating: “Only sovereign states can effectively respond to the challenges of the times and the demands of the citizens. Accordingly, any effective international order should take into account the interests and capabilities of the state and proceed on that basis, and not try to prove that they should not exist. Furthermore, it is impossible to impose anything on anyone, be it the principles underlying the sociopolitical structure or values that someone, for their own reasons, has called “universal”. After all, it is clear that when a real crisis strikes, there is only one universal value left and that is human life, which each state decides for itself how best to protect based on its abilities, culture and traditions.”

What a breath of fresh air!

Compare that to Klaus Schwab’s infamous “you’ll own nothing and be happy”.

From where did the dystopic world order of the Davos Crowd emerge?

H.G. Wells’ Open Conspiracy

It might surprise you, but to answer that question, we will need to jump back nearly one century into the past and meet an ageing misanthropic social engineer named Herbert George Wells who wrote a 1928 opus called The Open Conspiracy: Blueprint for a World Revolution calling for world government, and depopulation saying:

“The Open Conspiracy rests upon a disrespect for nationality, and there is no reason why it should tolerate noxious or obstructive governments because they hold their own in this or that patch of human territory.”

Wells was a member of an organization called The Fabian Society which itself was established in 1884 by a coterie of British eugenicists and Malthusians in order to promote a new social order designed to mold society into a new mechanized order run by a managerial elite of “social scientists” from above.

Throughout the 20th century, the Fabian Society would penetrate all branches of government, military, academia, media and even private corporate boards around the world creating global systems of fifth columns operating within cells, hierarchically unified by a central command within the highest echelons of British Intelligence.

From below, plebs and laborers would be attracted by “words” promoted by Fabians like equality, social justice, and re-distribution of wealth utilizing Marxist terms while never realizing that those words were just a sweet illusion with no claim to reality.

Like Jesuitical and Masonic orders, many Fabians would never have a clue what the machine truly was that they were merely parts of. This is why the British Labor Party (aka: The Fabian Party of Britain) was so often occupied by well-intended members who never had a clue what the game was truly about. The official Fabian School that became an ideological control hub and recruiting grounds for next generation talent (paralleling the Rhodes/Milner Round Table’s Oxford University) was the London School of Economics.

In fact, over the 20th century, these two oligarchical operations often interfaced closely, with the Fabian Lord Mackinder working with the Round Table’s Lord Milner to craft a strategy for North America in 1908 or the Canadian Fabian Society’s founding by five Rhodes Scholars in 1932.

HG Wells was explicit in his many works of non-fiction writing in 1904: “The way of nature has always been to slay the hindmost, and there is still no other way, unless we can prevent those who would become the hindmost being born. It is in the sterilization of failure, and not in the selection of successes for breeding, that the possibility of an improvement of the human stock lies.” (3)

Sculpting our Dreams into Nightmares through Storytelling It is no coincidence that Wells had spent the previous three decades innovating a new form of cultural warfare called “predictive programming”.

Whether it was in his science fiction stories of War of the Worlds, The Invisible Man, The World Set Free, The Island of Doctor Morrow or the Time Machine, Wells always infused trojan horses into his narratives that he knew would have lasting value on conditioning the broader zeitgeist.

These were simply: 1) human nature was intrinsically absurd, selfish and incapable of resolving the duty-freedom paradox in any believable manner, 2) science and technology would thus always be used towards selfish and destructive ends, 3) world government is the only salvation for humanity.

The only solution to such problems was that society had to be recast afresh according to a scientific priesthood which knew how to make the sorts of “hard” decisions that the dirty masses would never have the wits to make themselves. The theme of world government and collectivization of wealth under one central command were also themes advanced by Wells who wrote in 1940:

“Collectivisation means the handling of the common affairs of mankind by a common control responsible to the whole community. It means the suppression of go-as-you-please in social and economic affairs just as much as in international affairs. It means the frank abolition of profit-seeking and of every device by which human beings contrive to be parasitic on their fellow man. It is the practical realisation of the brotherhood of man through a common control”.

The Fabian Society propaganda organ The New Statesman wrote in 1931: “The legitimate claims of eugenics are not inherently incompatible with the outlook of the collectivist movement. On the contrary, they would be expected to find their most intransigent opponents amongst those who cling to the individualistic views of parenthood and family economics.”

While genuine socialists who truly cared about labor rights in opposition to oligarchical forces generally didn’t get along well with fascists, the peculiar species of Fabian socialists were always united with the fascist cause and always strove to destroy genuine-labor movements in any nation which they were permeating. If only those fascists could be cured of their nationalism wrote Wells, then he would gladly champion the swastika saying in 1932: “I am asking for liberal Fascisti, for enlightened Nazis”

Eugenics and Fascism: Miracle Solutions to the Great Depression

While these words were spoken, the Anglo-American financier oligarchy which Wells served had been well on its way to establishing a global system of political economy designed to impose eugenics onto humanity through its support for Hitler. This new science of government (with its corporatist flavor in Italy) was pushed onto the world as the “economic miracle solution” to the horrors of the great depression of 1929-1932 (itself also the cause of a controlled disintegration of a financial bubble).

Despite the fact that the fascist project failed in 1933 (when a central bankers dictatorship was derailed by Franklin Roosevelt) and again when the Hitler Frankenstein monster stopped obeying London’s orders and had to be put down, the blueprint for a New World Order continued into the post-war age under the design of an open conspiracy.

With Wells’ 1946 death, other Fabians and social engineers continued his work during the Cold War (including designing the Cold War itself as a way to destroy the system of win-win cooperation and U.S.-Russia-China friendship envisioned by FDR).

Post-War Fascism: Making the Unthinkable Become Thinkable

One of the leading grand strategists during this dark period was Wells’ associate (and former Fabian Society member), Lord Bertrand Russell, who wrote in his 1952 The Impact of Science on Society:

“I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is mass psychology…. Its importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda. Of these the most influential is what is called ‘education’. Religion plays a part, though a diminishing one; the press, the cinema and the radio play an increasing part… it may be hoped that in time anybody will be able to persuade anybody of anything if he can catch the patient young and is provided by the state with money and equipment.”

“The subject will make great strides when it is taken up by scientists under a scientific dictatorship. The social psychologists of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black. Various results will soon be arrived at. First that the influence of home is obstructive. Second that not much can be done unless indoctrination begins before the age of ten. Thirdly verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are very effective. Fourth that the opinion that snow is white must be held to show a morbid taste for eccentricity. But I anticipate. It is for future scientists to make these maxims precise and discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black, and how much less it would cost to make them believe it is dark gray.”

Russell’s dystopic vision was paralleled by his friend Sir Julian Huxley (founder of the United Nations Education, Science and Cultural Organization) in 1946 who said:

“The moral for UNESCO is clear. The task laid upon it of promoting peace and security can never be wholly realised through the means assigned to it- education, science and culture. It must envisage some form of world political unity, whether through a single world government or otherwise, as the only certain means of avoiding war… in its educational programme it can stress the ultimate need for a world political unity and familiarize all peoples with the implications of the transfer of full sovereignty from separate nations to a world organization.”

To what end would this “world political unity” be aimed? Several pages later, Huxley’s vision is laid out in all of its twisted detail:

“At the moment, it is probable that the indirect effect of civilization is dysgenic instead of eugenic, and in any case it seems likely that the dead weight of genetic stupidity, physical weakness, mental instability and disease proneness, which already exist in the human species will prove too great a burden for real progress to be achieved. Thus even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that is now unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”

The Economic Recolonization of the World

While many think the post-war years to have been shaped primarily by a Cold War, the reality is that the Iron Curtin was always merely a cover to impose a complete infiltration and colonization of the minds of citizens across the Trans Atlantic community that had given so much to stop the rise of fascism. The focus was especially placed on the young “baby boomer” generation who would suffer the most intensive full spectrum conditioning of any generation in history.

While the population was driven into states of insanity throughout the age of constant nuclear terror, asymmetrical wars abroad and drug-sex-rock’n’roll counterculture revolutions domestically.

By the time of Bobby Kennedy’s murder, and ouster of de Gaulle, the stage had been set for a new phase of colonialization of western nation states via the floating of the U.S. dollar and the destruction of the gold-reserve system that had served as the bedrock of the post-1945 Bretton Woods system. As long as the exchange rates were fixed then economic warfare against nations via short term speculation (which had always been a tool of the City of London) would not be possible. Additionally, the stability afforded by fixed exchange rates permitted long-term thinking and planning requisite to build large scale infrastructure and other scientific projects that required the sort of patience and foresight that short term market-driven thinking never allowed.

Under this new age of post-1971 deregulation, humanity was further atomized around a new idea of “value” which was driven by the notion that individual desires unbounded by regulation “cause” creative change within supposedly self-regulating forces of the marketplace. The more the formula “greed=good” became embedded within the operating system of western states, the more the broader structures of those states were commandeered by private corporations and banks which increasingly merged and fused into each other during an age of Darwinian “survival of the fittest”. The more that these interconnected supranational entities merged, the more those levers of economic power were ripped away from sovereign nation states and into the hands of private finance beholden to forces antagonistic to humanity. During this process, the once productive sectors of the economy that gave vitality to nations were atrophied and outsourced abroad.

Normal rates of investment into the maintenance and improvement of capital-intensive infrastructure seized up and industrial sectors were shut down and moved to cheap labor sectors abroad which themselves became new zones of modern slave labor filling western consumerism with “cheap goods” from China and cheap resources stolen from the global south.

Where monetary growth had formerly been tied to the growth of industrial production, the post-1971 paradigm tied monetary growth to ever increasing rates of unpayable debt and speculative capital unbounded from the real world.

Two Faces of Evil: WEF and Inter-Alpha Group

During that same fateful year of 1971, two other ominous entities were created.

In January 1971, an entity was set up in Switzerland by a protégé of Henry Kissinger named Klaus Schwab titled “The World Economic Forum”. One prominent founding member was Maurice Strong, a Rockefeller connected Canadian elitist that had become a founding father of the modern environmental movement and co-architect of the Club of Rome. One of the initiatives that Strong had helped build in 1970 was the 1001 Nature Trust which was project devoted to raising capital for the World Wildlife Fund for Nature and the new environmental movement. One of the founders of the WWF? Sir Julian Huxley.

The other ominous entity formed in 1971 was the Rothschild Inter-Alpha Group of banks under the umbrella of the Royal Bank of Scotland. The stated intention of this Group would be found in the 1983 speech by Lord Jacob Rothschild: “two broad types of giant institutions, the worldwide financial service company and the international commercial bank with a global trading competence, may converge to form the ultimate, all-powerful, many-headed financial conglomerate.”

What Lord Rothschild was referring to was the destruction of Glass-Steagall bank separation laws across the Trans Atlantic which had kept commercial banking, investment banking and insurance activities compartmentalized in separate worlds since WWII. In 1986, this destruction of the dividing walls in banking began with Margaret Thatcher’s Big Bang followed soon thereafter by Canada’s destruction of the Four Pillars. Although it took another 14 years, the final nail was put into the Glass-Steagall coffin when Clinton destroyed the law as one of his last acts in office. After this point, derivative contracts that had only accounted for $2 trillion in 1991, and $80 trillion in 1999 soon ballooned to over $650 trillion when the housing market blew out in the USA in 2007.

The Economy Becomes A Bomb

What is important to hold in mind is that through this entire post 1971 process, capitalism itself was thus slowly turned into a time bomb which could do nothing but collapse. This means that it is fatally wrong to consider the abuses of globalization or the collapse now underway as errors, but rather as the intended consequence of the system’s design itself.

The western nation states had lost their economic sovereignty as they sold their futures for the price of cheap goods from abroad making them addicted to keeping poor nations poor and cheap labor cheap (developing, modernizing nations tend to result in qualified, high paid labor not becoming of a banana republic).

And so, humanity slipped ever more into an “end of history” cage that ultimately sought a new world order to replace the old order of nation states and democracies that had governed the previous couple of centuries. More centralized supranational control of nation states by the financier oligarchy occurred behind such “free trade” agreements as NAFTA, and Maastricht in the early 1990s.

This was of course the near unstoppable trend after the Soviet Union’s disintegration (and the replication of western globalization within the short period of the 1990s Shock Therapy of Russia). I say thankfully “near unstoppable” because something very special and unexpected happened to derail this blueprint in 2013.

A New Operating System Emerges

I am here referring to the moment that Xi Jinping made it known to the world that China would not continue as the cheap labor hub of the west indefinitely and instead a new program dubbed the “Belt and Road Initiative” was unveiled as the driving force of China’s foreign policy. Soon this program merged with the Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union, and won over 140 nations of the world to its operating system with branches stretching into the Arctic dubbed the Polar Silk Road. The multipolar system of Eurasia which had been slowly moving forward between 1999-2013 began to take on an accelerated rate of growth with new financial institutions, large scale infrastructure projects, and new diplomatic platforms built up along the way.

By 2015 both Russia and China had created their own alternatives to the U.S.-controlled SWIFT and in that same year Russia entered Syria in defense of the principle of national sovereignty.

Now Russia and China, both encircled by the U.S. military industrial complex, have released a powerful joint statement establishing a manifesto for a new operating system that enshrines the principle of sovereign nation states, and activities that promote win-win cooperation and population growth as a bedrock of order.

So when Guterres wets his pants complaining about the danger of two opposing systems now emerging, or when Biden’s handlers promote democracy summits that exclude all the nations of the world who don’t want to be sacrificed on the alter of Gaia, you can be sure that it is because something compatible with human dignity has emerged.

Might the current freedom movements springing up across the trans Atlantic force a shift in the elements of the political class that have not lost their humanity to a World Economic Forum borg-like commitment to assimilate everything into a unipolar transhumanist priesthood? That remains to be seen.

No comments: