January 18, 2023

WORLD: World Economic Forum aka WEF Declares 2023 The ‘Year of the Polycrisis’. ๐Ÿ˜ฉ WEF VIP Driver Said, "My Car Is Normal Because For VIP I Cannot Drive Electricity Auto."

Newsmax published January 16, 2023: Trump warned of this at 2018 WEF. Eric Bolling discusses the worldwide political effects of the 2023 World Economic Forum on Monday's episode of "Eric Bolling The Balance."
Newsmax published January 16, 2023: Davos cops pull over 'Rebel News' team at WEF. 'Rebel News' founder Ezra Levant joins Eric Bolling from Davos to discuss his encounter with police outside the World Economic Forum.
Fox News published January 18, 2023: Global elites jet off to Davos to ruin our lives. Jesse Watters highlights the save the planet elites that gathered at Davos on ‘Jesse Watters Primetime.’

The Epoch Times
written by Kevin Stocklin
Monday January 16, 2023

The World Economic Forum’s (WEF) 53rd annual meeting of political leaders, corporate executives, and activists in Davos, Switzerland, will focus on rededicating its members to a progressive climate and social-justice agenda in the midst of what is described as “unprecedented multiple crises,” founder and Executive Chairman Klaus Schwab said.

“The theme of our meeting … is cooperation in a fragmented world,” Schwab stated. In what the WEF calls the “Year of the Polycrisis,” he declared that “economic, environmental, social, and geopolitical crises are converging and conflating, creating an extremely versatile and uncertain future.”

“We are all stuck in a crisis mindset,” he warned, but reassured attendees that “the annual meeting at Davos shall try to make sure that leaders do not remain trapped in this crisis mindset but develop a longer-term, constructive perspective to shape the future in more sustainable, more inclusive, and more resilient way.”

The summit, which began on Jan. 16, features a record turnout from many of the most powerful government and corporate officials. Some 379 public officials are attending, including 30 heads of state, 56 finance ministers, 19 central bank governors, and 39 heads of global organizations, including the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Trade Organization. About 1,500 executives from 700 companies, including 600 CEOs from the world’s largest corporations, may be attending.

“We have the key players globally,” said Borge Brende, one of several WEF managing directors, “to create collaboration even in this fractured world.” He also noted that the WEF is expecting “a high-level Chinese delegation.”

This year’s agenda includes doubling down on the transition to renewable energy, the codification of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) standards to make compliance more measurable, “social and green jobs for building inclusive and sustainable economies,” and “diversity equity and inclusion [DEI] lighthouses,” and a global risks report.

“How do we build the inclusive, sustainable, and resilient growth?” asked Saadia Zahidi, managing director of the WEF. “A group of leaders from the public and private sector will be coming together to address exactly that question, designing a framework, and starting to align around that new agenda.”

Zahidi said attendees will also be setting policy regarding the “human capital agenda. Without adequate investments in skilling and in education, none of these opportunities can really play out, nor will we have the kind of societal resilience that is needed to be prepared for future inevitable shocks,” she said. “So we’ll have a meeting of the reskilling revolution champions.”

Regarding the “polycrisis,” the WEF assembled an extensive matrix of threats facing the world. The top five short-term risks were the “cost-of-living crisis, natural disasters and extreme weather, geo-economic confrontation, failure to mitigate climate change, and erosion of social cohesion and societal polarization.” The report noted that, looking farther ahead, “the top four most severe risks over the next 10 years are all environmental.”

Regarding DEI, the report stated that despite $7.5 billion being spent on DEI reeducation programs, which will increase to $15.4 billion by 2026, “the pandemic has caused a generational loss in gender equality, increasing the projected time to reach global parity from 100 to 132 years.”

Global Ambitions on the Line

Whereas previous WEF summits faced little outside opposition, this year’s summit may well be taking place in what Schwab called a more “fragmented” world. The fragmentation includes not only the Russia–Ukraine war and rising tensions between the United States and China but also dissent within the countries that have pledged allegiance to the WEF agenda.

What had been a unified, behind-the-scenes consensus in support of the WEF’s ESG agenda has recently been brought to light and challenged, particularly in the United States, where conservative states have pushed back with anti-ESG legislation, boycotts, anti-trust investigations, and lawsuits.

“All these elites come in to the World Economic Forum and basically their vision is they run everything and everybody else is just a serf,” Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis said. He added that the WEF’s energy and social-justice agenda is “really weakening Western society and Western values. But underlying a lot of that is the CCP [Chinese Communist Party].”

Europe also has been experiencing some friction. In Italy, the conservative Brothers of Italy party swept into power last fall under the leadership of Giorgia Meloni, whose acceptance speech as prime minister was censored by YouTube, allegedly “in error.” Meanwhile, in Sweden, a conservative coalition led by the Moderate Party won a majority in parliament.

Much of the resistance to WEF’s global ambitions stems from the fact that people are now beginning to feel the effects of the ESG agenda. Its concerted effort against fossil fuels has led to shortages and price hikes, which have flowed through to other industries such as agriculture, manufacturing, and transportation, and, ultimately, led to record inflation in grocery stores and at the gas pump.

Inflation was further fueled by trillions in progressive government spending on social programs, stimulus payments, and renewable energy subsidies. This flood of dollars and euros chasing fewer available goods compelled central banks, particularly the U.S. Federal Reserve, to hike interest rates throughout 2022, driving up the cost of debt and threatening to send the world economy into recession.

WEF managing director Mirek Dusek conceded that these issues had put the ESG agenda on the defensive.

“We’ve been deploying a lot of defensive measure in response to some of these cascading crises that have been manifesting themselves in the international system,” Dusek said. “So how do we go on the front foot and really articulate and implement vision-driven, future-oriented business strategies and governmental policies that can help us be more resilient in the future?”

Along these lines, the Davos summit also seeks to reinforce the narrative that these problems are mainly the result of climate change.

“Climate change and ecosystem collapse are the biggest threats to humanity,” WEF managing director Gim Huay Neo stated. Her five areas of focus are “getting to net zero, building a nature-positive economy, regenerating food, water and ocean systems, circular use of resources, and finally addressing waste and pollution.”

ESG Backlash

This past year brought more evidence that the ESG ranks may be faltering. Asset managers BlackRock and State Street, which signed pledges to compel companies whose shares they owned to move toward net-zero emissions, flatly denied in December 2022 at a Texas state senate hearing that they ever used their power as shareholders to influence management toward ESG goals. At the same time, Vanguard, the third of the “Big Three” asset managers, withdrew from its membership in the Net Zero Asset Managers initiative (NZAM).

Facing inquiries and boycotts from other conservative states regarding discrimination against fossil fuel companies, most Wall Street banks also expressed their support for the oil and gas industry and touted the billions they had invested in the industry. And while the United States under the Biden administration has spent heavily on subsidies for wind, solar, and electric cars, and thrown up numerous regulatory hurdles for the fossil fuel industry, the courts have often checked the efforts of the federal bureaucracy to set industrial policy. Most notably, the U.S. Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency stated that only Congress can make laws on such weighty issues.

Nonetheless, Schwab praised the “rising role of the state” in private industry and stated: “The World Economic Forum is, as you know, the international organization for public–private cooperation, and public–private cooperations becomes even more essential today.” But there may be headwinds regarding this cooperation as well.

Concerns about government and corporations collaborating too closely were heightened by recent revelations that the FBI appears to have colluded with Twitter to censor news reports that could have hurt President Joe Biden’s election campaign. This week’s Davos guest list includes FBI Director Christopher Wray and U.S. Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines, though it is unclear what contribution America’s law enforcement and intelligence agencies will make to what is ostensibly an economic conference.

There are also increasing doubts about expanding the state’s role into industrial policy and directing energy production, following Europe’s narrow escape from energy rationing this winter thanks only to unseasonably warm weather. Nor was the reputation of government experts enhanced by the devastating mismanagement of the COVID-19 epidemic, including lockdowns, censorship, and an attempt to force companies to fire employees who refused the vaccine.

The 2023 agenda is a departure from the 2021 WEF summit, the theme of which was “the Great Reset,” a term that has since fallen out of favor with its authors.

This year, the WEF highlights the need to “restore trust,” but it remains to be seen whether this means strengthening ties among those on the guest list or also includes the trust of the wider public, which appears to have no role or vote in the decisions made at Davos.

“I guess there’s value to having a mixed government and commercial forum of some kind,” billionaire industrialist CEO Elon Musk stated in a tweet regarding the summit. “The WEF does kind of give me the willies though, but I’m sure everything is fine …”
I typed a transcript of the video above with interview by Japanese Journalist Masako Ganaha. Please pay attention because this is what the Commie Democrats are trying to do in California:

Masako Ganaha asked: What about your car?

WEF VIP Driver replied: My car is normal because for VIP I cannot drive electricity auto.

Masako Ganaha asked: Ahhh. I just interviewed one driver. Okay. Now I'm going to interview one of the driver who does not prefer to show his face. So how are you doing tonight?

WEF VIP Driver replied: Tonight it's well. Like yesterday also. VIP all are most come today because tomorrow the beginning it's (chaos? or Klaus?)

Masako Ganaha asked: What kind of people do you drive for?

WEF VIP Driver replied: I cannot say.

Masako Ganaha asked: Okay. Okay. I understand.

WEF VIP Driver replied: VIP too.

Masako Ganaha asked: I saw Uber cars are all on the side it says 100% electricity.

WEF VIP Driver replied: That's right. All Tesla. All electricity because here they need without gas or petrol. Only electricity to drive here with Uber. Yes I know that.

Masako Ganaha asked: What about your car?

WEF VIP Driver replied: My car is normal because for VIP I cannot drive electricity auto.

Masako Ganaha asked: Ahhh. Electricity car for example Tesla sometimes it has accidents or if there's no electricity.

WEF VIP Driver replied: It's dangerous because you locked out if you have some problems over the (?). That's a big problem with the Tesla. But now almost all from Tesla here. For Uber actually yeah.

Masako Ganaha asked: Uber is Tesla too?

WEF VIP Driver replied: Tesla yes.

Masako Ganaha asked: I wonder if the heavy storm comes. What do you think about this only electricity power the car is it going to be okay?

WEF VIP Driver replied: It is the same problem. The cars they need electricity too. It's the same. What's it save? Nothing. Electricity they need energy too.

Masako Ganaha asked: To make electricity we need to burn something or?

WEF VIP Driver replied: Maybe yes. (laughter)

Masako Ganaha asked: I asked about the 100% electricity powered cars and said it's dangerous. She added information, "According to World Economic Forum 2023: What's new? There will be a commercial heliport available in Davos again. There will be NO MORE CO2 LIMITS in order to request a car sticker."
Carrolline Quiqley published February 13, 2022: Klaus Schwab showing you his bust/statue of Lenin displayed for him to enjoy in his private office.  
Klaus Schwab admires Lenin who was a Communist just like him. Now who is Lenin you ask?

From History.com: Vladimir Lenin was a Russian Communist revolutionary and head of the Bolshevik Party who rose to prominence during the Russian Revolution of 1917, one of the most explosive political events of the twentieth century. The bloody upheaval marked the end of the oppressive Romanov dynasty and centuries of imperial rule in Russia. The Bolsheviks would later become the Communist Party, making Lenin leader of the Soviet Union, the world’s first communist state.

According to Encyclopedia.com: The Bolsheviks movement early development of Marxism in Russia. Marxism first attracted radical Russian intellectuals in the 1880s, when a few disillusioned populists saw in the emerging urban proletariat the key to transforming Russia's repressive political and social system. The movement gathered momentum in the 1890s with the acceleration of Russian industrialization.

According to MarkHumphrys.com: The Lenin / Trotsky period, 1917-24: Some people think Lenin and Trotsky were "not as bad" as Stalin, that the 1917 revolution was not criminal from the start, but only became criminal later. This is one of the greatest lies in history. Lenin and Trotsky killed 4 million people - men, women and children - by mass executions, death camps, and state-caused famine. Read The Black Book of Communism for a good introduction to their genocide, which started as soon as they got into power in 1917.

The famine: Russian famine of 1921, The Bolsheviks destroyed Russia's economy. By 1920 the ruble had lost 96 percent of its value. Lenin and Trotsky's oppression became ferocious as the cities ran out of food due to the collapse of the economy, caused by themselves and their stupid Marxist ideas. Innocent rural Russia was robbed of its food and butchered and starved by the parasitical urban communists.

The Bolsheviks started a massive program of confiscating the food of the countryside, and starved them into submission. The monsters Lenin and Trotsky deliberately started a famine as a political weapon. They caused the massive famine of 1921-22, deliberately killing millions of men, women and children. [Rudolph J. Rummel] estimates 2.5 million dead. [The Black Book of Communism] estimates 5 million dead.

From Dispropaganda.com, Lenin, the Communist mass murderer that owned nine Rolls-Royce. It was also Lenin that instituted the use of Communist concentration camps for political prisoners, also known as “Gulags”, throughout Communist Russia. The Gulag system, which would be expanded and multiplied under Stalin, would end up claiming the lives of millions of people.

While Lenin and his Communist gangsters went on and murdered countless of people in Russia simply because they owned private property, Lenin himself was not shy of behaving like a consummate, decedent, bourgeoisie.

So while the Russian peasants and proletarians were literally dying of hunger all over Russia, Lenin made sure that wherever he traveled to in Communist Russia to preach about his "Communist values", it was always in style, and always in a flashy, capitalistic, expensive, bourgeoisie, Rolls Royce.

Lenin's real legacy was that he replaced one totalitarian system, Tsarism, with another, Communism. Only Communism in Russia would prove to be much more destructive than Tsarism ever was, and would go on to claim the lives of tens of millions of people all over Europe untill the collapse of the USSR IN 1991.
COME ON PEOPLE. I NEED YOU TO SEE WHO THEY ARE. If a person admires Hitler everybody immediately freaks out right? So, um... hello... Lenin genocided ten times more people than Hitler did. They are both monsters that should not be admired and if they are why the hell are we even bothering to listen to these pyschopaths? or worse allowing these psychopaths to DICTATE HOW WE LIVE OUR LIVES and WHO GETS TO LIVE. (emphasis mine)

No comments: